Orwellian License Plate Controversy : 2003-01-01
Comments: 4  |  Permalink  |  View all rants
We're nearing two decades after 1984, but Newspeak is going strong. South Carolina judge William Bertelsman claims that "Choose Life" license plates violate the First Amendment. Let's review the amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
The license plate controversy is manifestly unrelated to the press, the right to assemble, or a redress of grievances. That leaves religion and free speech. Since this ruling abridges the freedom of speech of those purchasing the plates, the judge must believe that the license plate slogan establishes religion to such a degree that it overrides the free speech issues. Free speech is typically sacrosanct among those who flee to the First Amendment whenever they want to justify absurdities like a crucifix in urine being hailed as brilliant art, but the cultural Uruk-Hai are never above using the First Amendment in attempts to stifle the free speech of those they oppose.

So it comes to this--a simple slogan like "Choose Life" must be construed as an illegal establishment of religion. Which religion? Apparently an unorganized collection of all those who prefer not to choose death. But wait, when exactly did Congress make a law respecting the establishment of this undefined license plate religion? Bertelsman doesn't have a constitutional leg to stand on, but when has that ever stopped a loose constructionist? Orwell smiles smugly in his grave.



4 comments for Orwellian License Plate Controversy

1. al newell Email Web 2003-01-02  8:10am

re: "Choose Life" license plate.



the power of this evil world (cosmos) gaining more and more control. the persecuted church abroad face death and imprisonment and yet here we face the slow controlled death of sharing of sharing the gospel freely. Can't share at my job--- can't smoke at my job---can't share in public places, can't have license plates--pretty soon no smoking places--setting the stage.


2. Dean Esmay Email Web 2003-01-19  4:35am

Just horrible.



"Separation of Church and State" is now the doctrine of "anything which smacks of maybe being about church, or maybe not, shall be illegal."



Or somesuch. What rubbish.


3. Randy Brandt Email Web 2003-01-19  3:17pm

anything which smacks of maybe being about church, or maybe not, shall be illegal.



Subjectivity is fun for those in power, isn't it? Most people don't seem to realize how much protection objective strict constructionism gives them, and how much loose constructionism costs.


4. joel w Email Web 2003-02-11  12:25pm

You need a new blog entry!!!!


Comment on Orwellian License Plate Controversy










You must enter a seven (this reduces automated comment spam):

Welcome!
Register
Scamway - Merchants of Deception: Rant
AMWAY (UK) LIMITED ST ANNES HOUSE CALDECOTTE LAKE DRIVE CALDECOTTE BUSINESS PARK CALDECOTTE MILTON...
by Steve  2012-09-30  1:24pm
Franklin Graham Disappoints Again: Rant
What kind of sicko follows preachers around? Stalker maniac.
by Graham Cracker  2012-03-10  12:30pm
The Courage to Be Protestant: Non-Fiction
Here is another review by someone who shares your insistence on inerrancy and penal substitution. Can you say...
by Henry  2008-06-11  6:05pm
Pick The Brighter Tulip: Fiction
Alger fitch is my great grandfather, and i love ALL of his books. shame on you for creating such hatred over a book....
by Garrett Baker  2010-10-15  11:38am
Unless otherwise noted, all contents Copyright 2001-2013 Randy Brandt