President Pluralism : 2007-12-07
Comments: 6  |  Permalink  |  View all rants
Mitt Romney is hoping pluralism wins the day. The Republican presidential candidate spoke out on religion yesterday, saying,
"No candidate should become the spokesman for his faith. For if he becomes president, he will need the prayers of the people of all faiths."
All faiths? If a faith is false, what use are its prayers? Is prayer just some New Age cosmic force, or is it communication with a personality? Romney's statement was pure politics, for it's not even consistent with his Mormon beliefs. If he worships the true God, why would he need the prayers of those who worship trees, or perhaps themselves? Whatever you think of Romney, you have to admit he has a confused speechwriter when it comes to topics of faith.



6 comments for President Pluralism

1. Scott Kelly Email Web 2007-12-28  9:50am

At this point, I predict Romney will get the Republican nomination. He's got the money to out pace Huckabee and the pro-lifers will get on board with him when their only other real option is Obama or Hillary. I'm not a prophet or the son of a prophet, but I can make predictions, can't I? You heard it here first, folks.


2. Randy Email Web 2007-12-29  5:58am

Scott, I'd have a hard time disagreeing with you. It would be weird to vote for polytheist, though, wouldn't it?


3. Mark Email Web 2007-12-31  12:28pm

Randy, I think that Romney was trying to refer to Christian denominations when he said "all faiths." I think that's the engineer inside you taking things too literal. That said, I'm sure the whole issue is politics. There are many who will not vote for him just because of his Mormon beliefs and he is trying to remove that issue.


4. Randy Brandt Email Web 2007-12-31  2:55pm

Mark, I wish I knew which Mark you are: I know at least five well enough for them to respond, two of whom live in Utah. Perhaps he did mean denominations. Interesting take on what he said.


5. Mark Email Web 2007-12-31  11:28pm

Well, here's a clue. I used to live in Utah, but no longer. Not enough? How about 'watch out for Hugo'. ;-)


6. Randy Brandt Email Web 2008-01-01  11:51am

Ah, yes, the former Utahn (is that the right term)? Nice to have you stop by. Anyway, I agree with you that he's being very political. I'm still not sure what to think about the whole thing, but I know I'd prefer him to Billary.


Comment on President Pluralism










You must enter a seven (this reduces automated comment spam):

Welcome!
Register
Franklin Graham Disappoints Again: Rant
Dear sir, I am not defending Mr. Graham; the Lord is able to make him stand or fall, and Mr. Graham will answer to His...
by Heath McAnally  2010-08-06  6:29pm
Shame on Liberty U!: Rant
Fascinating breaking news, starrstruck! I knew there was a way for Liberty to spin it.
by Randy  2010-06-21  4:09pm
The Courage to Be Protestant: Non-Fiction
Here is another review by someone who shares your insistence on inerrancy and penal substitution. Can you say...
by Henry  2008-06-11  6:05pm
The Shack: Fiction
I want to pass along my recent review of ‘The Shack’. This review deals specifically with the issue of Christian...
by Mark  2010-07-21  11:28am
Unless otherwise noted, all contents Copyright 2001-2010 Randy Brandt